“He found his release and fulfilment in the classes in which he himself was a student. There he was able to recapture the sense of discovery he had felt that first day, when Archer Sloane had spoken to him in class and he had, in an instant, become someone other than who he had been. As his mind engaged itself with its subject, as it grappled with the power of the literature he studied and tried to understand its nature, he was aware of a constant change within himself; and as he was aware of that, he moved outward from himself into the world which contained him, so that he knew that the poem of Milton’s that he read or the essay of Bacon’s or the drama of Ben Jonson’s changed the world which was its subject, and changed it because of its dependence upon it.”

‘Stoner’ by John Williams

what drives exploration and investigation?



Surprisingly, it is not the intellect.

The intellect may well be utilised as a tool but it is not the driver.

How do you lay yourself open to inspiration?

There is a big difference between simile and metaphor: If you are asked to dance, quietly feel the difference between ‘dance like a bird’ and ‘you are a bird’. If your presence can be filled with images , thoughts and feelings of you as a bird, and you forget the other story of yourself, you will dance well. As soon as you become aware of dualities, for example between what you are being and what others think you are doing it will fail.

When you are the bird you feel your feet clutching the branches, the wind in your face, the hardness of your beak. When you slip out of this into dancing like a bird, the duality reappears and you become fragmented as usual.

This non dual deep belonging is not a mental visualisation. All activity is transformed. Spontaneity appears. The person you were, or you normally think you are is not present. That story has vanished.

There is no one left who dances, there is only the dance.

The actor does not act the part. Only when the actor as person is absent does the other temporarily emerge. The other is the creative mathematician, the scientist, the artist, the writer.

That’s all I can say about becoming an explorer.

The main problem is that people do not believe they can explore, they do not believe they are capable, they believe the story of themselves that is their normal story which has unfortunately been constructed over the years by inadequate experiences.So treat yourself how you would wish to become.

Do not fear the judgement of others.

Forget ‘can’t’, ‘don’t want to’, ‘don’t like’………….

Be imaginative, be explorers.

Find things that have never been seen by you before.


Find out something you didn’t know before about a square

the trial…

12-ness and 10-ness (and all number-nesses) are not in space-time. The humans however, are. At least they are normally considered to be so…

If one decides to ‘reduce’ 12-ness and 10-ness to objects in the world perceived as ‘normal’ by these humans, and further, if one desires them to be yet even more reduced into identical objects in what is known as ‘reality’, then let us then ascribe to them the property generally known amongst them as ‘cubic’ and let us then use these ‘cubes’, sometimes known as dice, in the following court case:

These are the statements to be put to the people:

Prosecution:  “These 10 cubes are henceforce to be considered superior to these 12 cubes.”

Defence: “These 12 cubes are henceforth to be considered superior to these 10 cubes.”

Challenge: Set up a situation in which the pros and cons of this matter are considered and then judged by a jury of impartial citizens…

huatou: is 12 in the ‘real’ world ‘better’ than 10 ?

the previous post and this one will relate to the next one


This is Fibonacci’s series. It’s often found in natural systems. Pick up a calculator. If you take one term and divide by the previous one you will get a number. The further you go along the series you will find that the number gets closer and closer to a certain value. That value is the ratio used in the previous post with rodman and the magic or golden rectangle. It’s rumoured that the Greeks used this proportion in the shape of the rectangle in the sides of the Parthenon in Athens but this is now refuted. It is also suggested by some that if you make a group of different sized rectangles including one with this ratio, the majority of people when asked, ‘Which rectangle looks the nicest?’, will pick this one. Try it… of course being a fair-test kind of person you’ll have to ask a lot of people and not influence the outcome…if you look here and scroll down you will see many other instances in architecture, painting, music and nature.